Entrepreneurship

Overview

PetaScale: taking enzymatic microplastic degradation from the lab to wastewater treatment plants and beyond.

1. Executive Summary

PetaBite and PetaScale share a single ambition: transforming microplastic biodegradation from a student‑led research initiative into a commercially viable platform capable of global scale. PetaBite, our iGEM project, served as the technical proving ground, taking the technology and prototype from 0 to 1. PetaScale, our commercialization effort, now builds on that foundation to carry it from 1 to n, translating the validated science into real‑world deployment and industrial partnerships.

While iGEM Toronto's technical teams ran the experimental validation, our entrepreneurship team specifically worked on product-market fit, customer discovery, and regulatory mapping. We tested and refined our business model across five Canadian national competitions, four global competitions, and two international conferences, with support from 17 institutional and community sponsors - the most in iGEM Toronto history. In six of those competitions, we placed within the top 3 overall, standing out from a cumulative field of hundreds of early‑stage startups and university design teams.

Furthermore, through our project and pitch, selected team members attended or competed in several international summits, including Y Combinator Summer School, Web Summit Vancouver, SynBioBeta Global, and the Canadian Food Forward Summit. Three Canadian venture capital firms have engaged in early discussions with us, and we have successfully completed the Wilbe startup incubator sprint program. This outside interest shows that investors and industry see commercial potential in our approach. Further details are in the Appendix below.

PetaScale has also identified wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as its beachhead market. We held 20 feasibility conversations with WWTP operators, engineers, researchers, and managers, and these conversations confirmed that our approach fits their operations and that they need a solution. We have also mapped expansion paths into three adjacent verticals: microfibre filtration, landfill leachate treatment and textile effluent treatment. The same enzymatic platform supports all four verticals.

Q&A

1. Has the team discovered their first potential customers and identified any unmet needs not yet covered by other existing solutions?

Yes. We are targeting wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as our beachhead market. WWTPs represent the last opportunity to capture microplastics before they reach natural waterways and are the primary accumulation point for PET in sidestreams and biosolids. Through 20 interviews with operators, engineers, researchers, and managers across Ontario, Alberta, and Newfoundland, we have confirmed workflow compatibility and strong deployment feasibility.

Through these conversations we defined a critical market gap. Traditional technologies like membrane filtration and activated carbon only capture and relocate microplastics rather than breaking them down. Meanwhile, enzymatic alternatives (such as LCC-ICCG) require temperatures near 70 °C, making them far too costly for high-volume operations. Our proprietary enzymes degrade PET at the temperatures wastewater plants already operate at, unlocking enzymatic solutions as a practical solution for the first time. This exact vulnerability exists across our three expansion verticals: textile effluent, landfill leachate and microfibre filtration.

2. Has the team shown that their solution is possible, scalable and inventive?

Yes! The RNA Lab, our associate lab, screened 161 randomly selected natural enzymes through the Logan consortium. Two outperformed FAST-PETase, a leading enzyme engineered through machine learning and rational design. This shows that natural enzymes can beat engineered benchmarks, and with that hit rate, PETAdex's 300M unique proteins should contain millions more.

Furthermore, other groups optimize a handful of known enzymes through directed evolution. We search the natural sequence landscape that evolution has already refined over hundreds of millions of years, which turns enzyme engineering into bioprospecting at planetary scale.

Finally, our computational funnel screens millions of sequences, high-throughput assays test candidates in parallel, and our bioreactor array measures activity across many environmental conditions at once. These form a closed loop of predict, test, update and repeat. Each cycle improves our models, and the same loop extends to other polymers, conditions and verticals.

3. Has the team presented logical product development plans with realistic milestones, timelines, resources and risks?

Yes. Our roadmap runs from prototype to deployment and beyond. Between July and November 2026, we are testing our initial enzymes on the bioreactor array and showcasing proof of concept at the iGEM Grand Jamboree. Following the submission of our combined Dry Lab and Wet Lab manuscript by February 2027, we will incorporate PetaScale and file a provisional patent in early March 2027. By mid-2027, we plan to close a Canadian venture round, move into a commercial lab space within MaRS Toronto, and launch at least two WWTP pilots by the end of 2027.

We also have the resources and foresight to execute. Our advisors cover IP, WWTP engineering and commercialization, our bioreactors are designed for a target cost under $100 per unit, and we have already initiated conversations with FrontRow Ventures, Northside Ventures, and the MaRS Investment Accelerator Fund. Furthermore, we have proactively engineered solutions for our three primary risks: we built high-throughput assays and parallel bioreactor arrays to overcome wet lab screening limits, we designed a completely contained bioreactor system to bypass regulatory hurdles associated with open environmental release, and we are synchronizing our incorporation and provisional patent filing with our manuscript submission to safeguard our IP.

4. Has the team outlined the skills, capabilities, and stakeholders required to be credible in developing their solution further?

Yes. Seven subteams cover the full range this problem demands, including computational biology and machine learning in Dry Lab, high-throughput assay design in Wet Lab, bioreactor engineering in Hardware, and commercial strategy in Entrepreneurship. The RNA Lab, the group behind the Logan dataset, supports us as our associate lab, and our advisors add IP, WWTP engineering and commercialization expertise.

Our Human Practices team engages the three stakeholder groups that determine whether this technology reaches deployment: regulators at Environment and Climate Change Canada and the US EPA, plant operators and compliance officers across four provinces, and academic researchers with a decade of plastic degrading enzyme (PETase) expertise. This outreach has mapped the regulatory pathways we must follow, including CEPA, EPA TSCA Section 5 and provincial discharge permits, and those constraints feed directly into our technical decisions.

5. Has the team considered the positive and negative long-term impacts of their fully developed solution?

Yes, for both perspectives.

A room-temperature enzymatic platform would cut PET degradation from centuries to hours and give us an economically viable way to remediate plastic already in the environment, which current options only store or downcycle. We grow that impact in three phases over a decade: PET degradation in wastewater treatment, then remediation across multiple polymer types, then circular materials that turn degraded plastic into usable feedstock.

We also weigh the risks. Releasing engineered enzymes into open environments carries ecological uncertainty, so we prioritize variants with close homology to natural proteins and design for contained deployment first. Deployment raises equity concerns as well, because municipal water systems disproportionately serve lower-income communities, who would be first exposed to any unintended effects. Our risk and regulatory framework sets the evidence we require before we deploy - outlined in the Entrepreneurship Regulatory Landscape section.

2. Problem Statement

Global plastic production has grown far beyond what waste systems were built to handle. Annual output rose from about 1.5 million tonnes in 1950 to more than 430 million tonnes in 2024, a nearly 290-fold increase (PlasticsEurope, 2025), and the trajectory shows no sign of reversing. Under the OECD's baseline scenario, global plastics use is projected to grow from 460 million tonnes in 2019 to 1,231 million tonnes by 2060, outpacing most raw materials (OECD, 2022). Over the same period, annual plastic leakage into the environment is projected to double from about 22 million tonnes to 44 million tonnes, and the stock of plastic in aquatic ecosystems is projected to more than triple, from about 140 million tonnes to nearly 500 million tonnes (OECD, 2022). Much of this plastic breaks down into microplastics, particles smaller than 5 mm that persist for centuries under environmental conditions and spread through soil, waterways, food and drinking water.

Effects on Human Health

Unfortunately, evidence of microplastics in the human body continues to grow. Researchers have detected micro- and nanoplastics in human blood (Leslie et al., 2022), placenta (Ragusa et al., 2021), and organs including the kidney, liver, and brain. Concentrations in brain tissue rose by about 50% between 2016 and 2024 and were highest in patients with dementia (Nihart et al., 2025). Cardiovascular data raise similar concerns. Patients whose carotid artery plaque contained microplastics had about 4.5 times the risk of heart attack, stroke or death over the following three years compared with patients whose plaque did not (Marfella et al., 2024).

Effects on Agriculture

Microplastics also threaten agriculture. Microplastics that build up in soil can disrupt plant metabolism, reduce crop yields, and harm soil organisms (Zhou et al., 2021). The smallest particles can also enter plants directly. Crop plants absorb submicrometre plastics through their roots and move them into stems and leaves, including edible tissue such as lettuce leaves (Li et al., 2020). This creates a potential pathway for plastic particles to enter the food chain through the consumption of contaminated crops. Plastics in soil can also carry pathogens. When plastic surfaces come into contact with wastewater or livestock waste, microbial biofilms colonize them, and this community, known as the plastisphere, can harbour human pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes (Zhu et al., 2022). Because microplastics stick to crop surfaces and washing does not fully remove them, they may carry these pathogens onto food (Quilliam et al., 2023).

The Status Quo

Current approaches to plastic waste include membrane filtration, mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, and incineration with each having major limits. Filtration captures microplastics and moves them into sludge or waste streams without breaking them down. Mechanical recycling degrades material quality with each cycle. Incineration releases emissions and destroys the material. Chemical recycling can break PET into its monomers, terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG), and rebuild them into resin, but that resin costs more than fossil-derived plastic, which limits its commercial viability. None of these approaches removes microplastics already in the environment at a cost that works at scale. The world needs a way to break plastic down into its molecular building blocks at the points where it accumulates.

Regulatory Pressure

As a result, regulators across major markets now treat microplastics as a compliance issue. The EU Regulation 2023/2055 restricts the use of intentionally added synthetic polymer microparticles (European Commission, 2023), while Directive 2024/3019 requires member states to monitor microplastics in urban wastewater treatment systems (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2024). In Canada, the Federal Plastics Registry mandates that manufacturers and importers report detailed data on the plastics they place on the market (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2024). Since 2022, more than 170 countries have been negotiating a global treaty to end plastic pollution (United Nations Environment Programme, 2022).

The Timing of PetaScale

Thus, the timing for PetaScale’s plastic degrading enzyme (PETase) technology is exceptionally strong. Governments are tightening compliance frameworks, and industries managing plastic waste urgently need scalable biological solutions to a problem that has persisted for decades. Advances in enzyme engineering and metagenomic discovery have brought enzymatic degradation closer to commercial viability. The scale of the challenge, its human and agricultural costs, coupled with mounting regulatory pressure, has created a market where technical advantage is both valuable and defensible. PetaBite/PetaScale meets this need through a scalable biological platform for PET microplastic removal, a solution explored in detail in the following sections.

References
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2024). Federal Plastics Registry: Notice under section 46 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/reduce-plastic-waste/federal-plastics-registry.html
  • European Commission. (2023). Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/2055 of 25 September 2023 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) as regards synthetic polymer microparticles. Official Journal of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2055/oj
  • European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Directive (EU) 2024/3019 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast). Official Journal of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/3019/oj
  • Leslie, H. A., van Velzen, M. J. M., Brandsma, S. H., Vethaak, A. D., Garcia-Vallejo, J. J., & Lamoree, M. H. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International, 163, 107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199
  • Li, L., Luo, Y., Li, R., Zhou, Q., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Yin, N., Yang, J., Tu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Effective uptake of submicrometre plastics by crop plants via a crack-entry mode. Nature Sustainability, 3(11), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0567-9
  • Marfella, R., Prattichizzo, F., Sardu, C., Fulgenzi, G., Graciotti, L., Spadoni, T., D'Onofrio, N., Scisciola, L., La Grotta, R., Frigé, C., Pellegrini, V., Municinò, M., Siniscalchi, M., Spinetti, F., Vigliotti, G., Vecchione, C., Carrizzo, A., Accarino, G., Squillante, A., … Paolisso, G. (2024). Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine, 390(10), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309822
  • Nihart, A. J., … Campen, M. J. (2025). Bioaccumulation of microplastics in decedent human brains. Nature Medicine, 31, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03453-1
  • OECD. (2022). Global plastics outlook: Policy scenarios to 2060. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/aa1edf33-en
  • PlasticsEurope. (2025). Plastics – the fast facts 2025. https://plasticseurope.org/
  • Quilliam, R. S., Pow, C. J., Shilla, D. J., Mwesiga, J. J., Shilla, D. A., & Woodford, L. (2023). Microplastics in agriculture – a potential novel mechanism for the delivery of human pathogens onto crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1152419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1152419
  • Ragusa, A., Svelato, A., Santacroce, C., Catalano, P., Notarstefano, V., Carnevali, O., Papa, F., Rongioletti, M. C. A., Baiocco, F., Draghi, S., D'Amore, E., Rinaldo, D., Matta, M., & Giorgini, E. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environment International, 146, 106274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
  • United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). End plastic pollution: Towards an international legally binding instrument (UNEP/EA.5/Res.14). https://www.unep.org/inc-plastic-pollution
  • Zhou, J., Wen, Y., Marshall, M. R., Zhao, J., Gui, H., Yang, Y., Zeng, Z., Jones, D. L., & Zang, H. (2021). Microplastics as an emerging threat to plant and soil health in agroecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147444
  • Zhu, D., Ma, J., Li, G., Rillig, M. C., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2022). Soil plastispheres as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and potential pathogens. The ISME Journal, 16(2), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01103-9

3. Solution / Technology Overview

Plastic-degrading enzymes (PETases) are a promising solution to microplastic pollution and engineered variants such as FAST-PETase and LCC-ICCG already perform well under controlled lab conditions. However, two limitations still hold the field back: a lack of data and poor performance outside the lab. Most groups improve the same handful of known enzymes through rounds of engineering, which leaves most of nature's enzyme diversity untested. These enzymes also only work best under very narrow temperature, pH, and substrate concentration ranges. LCC-ICCG, one of the best-performing variants, needs temperatures near 70 °C, which makes it impractical in wastewater treatment plants, lakes and mixed waste streams. Wet lab testing is also slow, and while unlabeled sequence data is abundant, the field has very little labelled data on how enzymes perform across real operating conditions. Progress has therefore concentrated on optimizing a few known scaffolds for controlled reactor conditions, which leaves performance in the field largely unaddressed.

Our mission is to deploy the most efficient and versatile plastic-degrading enzymes at planetary scale. Our approach differs from existing work in two ways: we search nature's full enzyme diversity and we design and test every enzyme for the specific environmental conditions where it will be used.

We have already solved the first limitation: a lack of data. Before our work, researchers had characterized only about 495 plastic-degrading enzymes worldwide, far too few to train a model on which sequences degrade plastic and under what conditions. So our Dry Lab team built PETadex (petadex.net), the world's largest open-source database of plastic-degrading enzyme candidates, to close that gap. Using the Logan index, a planetary-scale metagenomic search system built from our associate lab, the RNALab identified about 300M unique proteins from environments worldwide, expanding the searchable pool more than 600,000-fold. The first screen of 161 randomly selected candidates returned two that outperformed FAST-PETase, a leading engineered benchmark, which confirms that the database contains enzymes worth finding. Finally, we made the PETadex open access so any researcher can build on this diversity, since proprietary datasets and siloed efforts have slowed the field.

This iGEM cycle, we are solving the second limitation: performance outside the lab. Even the best PETases lose much of their activity in industrial conditions, at variable temperatures or alongside mixed contaminants. We are building a machine learning pipeline that uses the PETadex dataset to select and engineer enzymes for specific real-world conditions, starting with room-temperature activity. We test each candidate with high-throughput wet lab assays and an in-house bioreactor array that replicates the conditions enzymes face during deployment. Each round of testing feeds labelled data back into our models, so every cycle improves the next set of predictions. No other PETase effort we know of combines this scale of candidate discovery with systematic, condition-specific testing.

Our first target is wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), where our enzymes can degrade PET at ambient temperatures. We will then expand to landfill leachate and contaminated bioremediation sites, where PETases can break down accumulated PET in water and soil. We also see opportunities at the points where PET first enters the environment: degrading PET fragments shed during textile manufacturing, clearing PET microfibres from washing machine filters and dryer lint traps, and formulating PETases into detergents that degrade microfibres released from synthetic fabrics during the wash cycle.

4. Value Proposition

Every company commercializing plastic degrading enzymes today builds around one engineered enzyme and one operating window. Companies such as Carbios, Samsara Eco, and Protein Evolution use enzymes to recycle concentrated, pre-sorted plastic inside controlled reactors, where they can heat the material, adjust pH and pretreat the plastic to suit the enzyme. Carbios, for example, grinds and amorphizes PET before degrading it near 70 °C. That model may work in a recycling plant, but it ultimately fails where microplastics actually accumulate. Heating the large volumes of water that flow through a wastewater treatment plant would be far too expensive, and conditions change from one part of a plant to the next: clarifiers run at ambient temperature, mesophilic anaerobic digesters run at about 35 °C, and thermophilic digesters run at about 55 °C.

PetaScale, on the other hand, matches the enzyme to the site. For each deployment point, we select and engineer an enzyme that works optimally at that point's existing temperature, pH and salinity, so the facility needs no heating, pretreatment or new infrastructure. This keeps retrofit costs low and lets one bioengineering platform serve multiple WWTPs, landfill leachates, facilities producing textile effluents, and appliance filtration environments.

Our competitive advantage is a growing portfolio of patented optimized enzymes, each engineered for a specific real-world condition. Engineered enzymes such as FAST-PETase and LCC-ICCG come from optimizing a small handful of known enzymes, which limits how far any design can extend beyond its original operating window. Our approach starts from a much larger set of natural sequences that evolved across a wide range of environments, some of which already compete with the best engineered enzymes, such as when the two top candidates from our first screen produced about four times more TPA than FAST-PETase under identical conditions. From these starting points, we engineer variants for each deployment condition and profile them on our bioreactor array across temperature, pH and salinity. Field data from every customer deployment then guides the next round of engineering. Although the PETadex may stay open to all researchers, the engineered enzymes we build on top of it are our own, patenting each one. Every new deployment site and every new vertical adds more protected enzymes to our portfolio, so our lead widens as we grow.

5. Customer Segments

PetaScale serves municipal and industrial organizations that need a scalable way to remove microplastics from their water and waste streams.

Beachhead market: wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). WWTPs are our most technically validated and commercially promising entry point. Wastewater from homes and industry flows through these plants before it reaches lakes and rivers, which makes them the first point where operators can control microplastics before they spread downstream. We immobilize our PETases in packed-bed reactors, which degrade PET polymers inside the plant while keeping the enzyme contained. Through 20 interviews with operators, researchers, and technical staff across Ontario, Alberta, and Newfoundland, we confirmed that our approach fits existing plant workflows. Purchasing decisions in this segment involve municipal infrastructure directors, plant operators and environmental compliance officers. Regulatory pressure on these decision-makers is rising, led by the EU's new requirement to monitor microplastics in urban wastewater treatment (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2024).

Adjacent Verticals

Beyond WWTPs, we have also explored expanding into three adjacent verticals.

Textile effluent. Textile manufacturers release PET fibres and fragments into their wastewater during production. PETases add an in-line treatment step that degrades this PET before the wastewater leaves the facility, with no change to the production process. Sustainability officers and production managers are the buyers in this segment and the treatment step supports their compliance and ESG reporting.

Landfill leachate. As plastic breaks down in landfills, it releases PET microplastics into leachate, which often flows to WWTPs or surface water. PETases can treat this leachate before it is discharged. Municipal waste authorities and environmental engineering firms that manage leachate treatment are the buyers in this segment.

Filtration. PETases built into filtration cartridges or post-wash modules can degrade microfibres where the filter captures them, before the filter is cleaned or thrown away. Customers include appliance manufacturers and water treatment technology providers that develop household, industrial and municipal filtration systems.

Noticeably, for filtration in particular, regulation is pushing this market forward. France passed the first law requiring microfibre filters in all new household and commercial washing machines from January 1, 2025 (Loi n° 2020-105, 2020, art. 79), although it should be noted that the government has not yet published the decree needed to enforce it (Pillefer, 2026). The EU is also developing standards to measure fibre shedding and filter efficiency and is reviewing its ecodesign rules for washing machines, with both processes expected to conclude by late 2026 (Krzan, 2025). In the United States, the proposed Fighting Fibers Act of 2025 would require a microfibre filtration system in every new washing machine sold (Fighting Fibers Act of 2025, 2025). As filters become standard, manufacturers will need a way to deal with the microfibres those filters collect. PetaScale plans to supply the enzymes that break down captured PET.

Vertical Reports

We conducted comprehensive research across each of the four verticals, and the embedded reports below analyze them in detail through the following categories:

  • Customer description and technical feasibility. What the vertical is, why these customers would benefit from PetaScale’s product, the technical literature supporting deployment under their conditions, the stakeholder interviews we conducted if applicable, and a SWOT analysis.
  • Market size and opportunity. Total addressable market, serviceable addressable market, and serviceable obtainable market, with an estimate of the share PetaScale could realistically capture in Canada.
  • Barriers to entry. The obstacles that could slow adoption, including procurement cycles, and, technical validation requirements, and, how we plan to navigate each one.
  • Competitor matrix. The companies that operate in the vertical, what they offer, and, where their approach falls short.

Additional context: The vertical descriptions, particularly those for the WWTP and Textile Discardant Pellet sections, integrate quotes and insights from stakeholder interviews conducted by our team. Comprehensive documentation of all interviews is available in the Human Practices – Stakeholder Outreach section.

Primary vertical5.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs)
5.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) cover pageFull report coming soon
Expansion5.2 Landfill Leachate
5.2 Landfill Leachate cover pageFull report coming soon
Expansion5.3 Filtration
5.3 Filtration cover pageFull report coming soon
Expansion5.4 Textile Discard
5.4 Textile Discard cover pageFull report coming soon
References

6. Regulatory Landscape

Deploying an enzyme-based microplastic degradation technology in Canada requires navigating a two-tier regulatory system. Federal review determines whether the enzyme itself is legal to manufacture and use nationwide, while provincial review governs its deployment at specific provincial facilities.

Entrepreneurship Regulatory Landscape
PDF coming soon

7. Business Model

PetaScale is a B2B enzyme company. We engineer plastic-degrading enzymes to work under the conditions each customer already operates in.

Fortunately, published work shows this is achievable. Researchers have found PET-degrading enzymes in compost, marine, and soil environments (Tournier et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2022). Our PETadex database gives us 300M unique proteins, so each engineered design begins from an enzyme that already works in conditions close to the customer's.

How PetaScale Works

  1. Defining the conditions. The customer provides the operating conditions under which our enzymes must function: parameters such as temperature, pH, and salinity. These inputs define the design environment specifications for enzyme development.
  2. Engineering the enzyme. We select the closest candidate from PETadex, engineer it to the specification, and validate its activity under the described customer's conditions.
  3. Building the delivery system. We produce the enzyme and package it in the format its environment requires.
  4. Deploy. The format depends on the vertical:
    • WWTPs: a packed-bed reactor holding immobilized enzymes, installed on a filtered side stream so it adds to existing infrastructure without interrupting plant flow.
    • Textile effluent and landfill leachate: metered enzyme dosing into existing treatment lines.
    • Filtration: enzyme loaded into cartridges and post-wash modules.

How We Make Money

  • WWTPs: Utilities pay per million litres treated under multi-year contracts with regional authorities. The fee covers reactor installation, maintenance, replacement of spent enzyme cartridges, and delivery. Revenue recurs and grows with the volume of water treated.
  • Textile effluent and landfill leachate: Operators pay for a pilot, which converts to a per-site service contract once we prove performance.
  • Filtration: Manufacturers license the enzyme or buy enzyme-loaded cartridges as a component, and they keep control of their product and distribution.

Why This Model Works

We start with WWTPs because a small number of regional authorities control most of the treated water in a region, which gives us recurring revenue and field data early. Each new vertical reuses the same four-step pipeline under different conditions, so expansion costs far less than entering each market from scratch. Every deployment also returns activity data from real operating conditions, and that data shortens the next design cycle.

8. Selling & Customer Relationships

The Business Model section sets out what our customers pay for. This section explains how we acquire those customers and retain them.

As aforementioned, our first customers run wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), which are regulated public infrastructure. An operator's first responsibility is keeping effluent within permit limits, and few operators will change a working process because a new technology sounds promising. For that reason, every sale starts with data from the customer's specified environmental conditions. We ask for a commitment only after the customer has seen our enzymes function within their respective use-case.

How We Reach Decision-Makers

Our sales process starts with feasibility conversations. Over the iGEM cycle, we spoke with 20 WWTP operators, engineers, researchers, and managers in Ontario, Alberta, and Newfoundland. Through these conversations we learned how plants run day to day, collected data on conditions that would affect enzyme performance, and who approves spending. The conversations also gave us our first working relationships with the staff who would run a pilot.

A single purchase at a municipal plant involves several people and each one needs different evidence. Operators and engineers want to know whether the enzyme will work in their plant, so we show them activity data measured under their own operating conditions. Infrastructure directors and compliance officers focus on risk. For them, we explain how a contained packed-bed reactor fits within existing permits and budgets, and how it prepares the plant for future microplastic monitoring requirements. Procurement officers manage the purchase itself. Public contracts usually go to competitive tender, so our pilot results help define the technical requirements for that tender.

Outside the municipal sector, our buyers include textile sustainability officers, landfill engineers and filtration product managers. These buyers weigh cost against compliance, so we begin with a contained, closed-loop trial on their own waste stream.

From Feasibility Conversation to Contract

A feasibility conversation converts into a contract in four steps:

  1. Sample collection. We ask the customer for a sample of their material, such as thickened sludge, along with its temperature, pH and salinity. A customer who sends a sample and assigns staff time to the project has made a real commitment, and we treat that as the first sign of fit.
  2. Laboratory testing. Before testing begins, the customer sets the success criteria. We then test our enzymes on the sample under the customer's conditions and measure PET degradation using methods both parties have agreed on.
  3. Results report. We report how much PET the enzyme degraded, how quickly and at what dose. If the results meet the agreed criteria, the customer has evidence drawn from their own material.
  4. Pilot and contract. A successful test leads to a pilot agreement, under which we install a packed-bed reactor at one plant. If the pilot meets its targets, it converts to a multi-year contract. We write our WWTP contracts to cover every eligible plant a regional authority runs, so a single pilot can open several plants.

We have completed the feasibility stage in the WWTP vertical, and we will use the same process for textile effluent, landfill leachate and filtration.

What Product-Market Fit Looks Like

We judge fit by what customers commit, since positive feedback costs a customer nothing. In each vertical, we look for a specific commitment:

  • WWTPs: A regional authority provides sludge samples, signs a pilot agreement with defined success criteria, and budgets for a full contract once the pilot meets those criteria.
  • Textile effluent: A mill provides production wastewater samples and co-funds an in-line trial, and it names a sustainability or production lead who is accountable for the result.
  • Landfill leachate: A waste authority or engineering firm provides leachate samples, shares its treatment data and commits a site to a contained pilot.
  • Filtration: An appliance or filtration manufacturer signs a joint development agreement to test enzyme-loaded cartridges in its own product.

How We Retain Customers

After a contract is signed, we report PET degradation and system performance to each customer on a fixed schedule, using the testing methods agreed at the start. Regular reporting keeps results visible to the decision‑makers who approved the purchase which is very critical when contracts come up for renewal. Each deployment also feeds field data back into our engineering pipeline, enabling us to design higher‑performing enzymes for that customer and others within adjacent verticals.

9. Go-To-Market Timeline

PetaBite represents the scientific foundation of our work and the open-source stage of the project. PetaScale represents the next stage, which commercializes that research engine into a scalable platform. We are formally separating the two entities for intellectual property purposes, with a defined transition point at the finalization of our Dry Lab and Wet Lab publications.

Definitions

Two organizations appear throughout this timeline:

  • BioZone is the University of Toronto's Centre for Applied Bioscience and Bioengineering, located in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. It houses research labs in industrial biotechnology and environmental bioengineering, and it is where our current R&D takes place.
  • MaRS Discovery District is a large innovation hub in downtown Toronto that provides office and lab space, commercialization support and investor connections to early-stage science and technology companies. Its MaRS Investment Accelerator Fund, funded by the Government of Ontario, is one of the province's most active seed-stage investors, and we are in conversation with them now.

Overview of the Next 12 Months: Milestones (September 2026 to December 2027)

MilestoneWindowFocus
Milestone 0Now–Nov 2026Enzyme prototype development, through the iGEM Grand Jamboree
Milestone 1Aug 2026–Feb 2027Close the R&D cycle, manuscript, market validation, IP assignment sweep
Milestone 2Early March 2027PetaScale formation: Canadian incorporation and IP
Milestone 3Late March–April 2027Incubator submissions and Canadian VC raise
Milestone 4May–Aug 2027Move into MaRS, continued R&D, customer pipeline
Milestone 5Sept–Dec 2027Land at least two WWTP pilots, full patent strategy

Milestone 0: Enzyme Prototype Development (Now to November 2026)

We are currently at this milestone. Our Wet Lab and Hardware teams are producing and testing the first candidate enzymes on the bioreactor array at BioZone. This work generates the room-temperature activity data that supports both our manuscript and our commercial claim. The milestone ends at the iGEM Grand Jamboree in Paris, where we present our preliminary prototype results publicly.

Milestone 1: Research Cycle and Market Validation (August 2026 to February 2027)

Our central deliverable is the combined Dry Lab and Wet Lab manuscript. Drafting began in August, and we target submission for February. This submission closes the PetaBite R&D cycle and sets the IP dividing line between PetaBite and PetaScale.

We also complete an intellectual property assignment sweep in this window, while the full project team is still together. Every member who contributed to the design pipeline, the enzyme candidates or the bioreactor hardware signs an assignment to the company, including members who have graduated or left the team. At the same time, we document exactly where the boundary sits between the open-source PETAdex release and the proprietary work PetaScale will own. Completing this before incorporation avoids the most common diligence problem for university spinouts, which is unassigned contributions surfacing years later.

Alongside this work, we continue customer discovery across our WWTP, textile effluent, landfill leachate and filtration verticals, and we evaluate incubator options. Our official raise opens with Canadian venture capital warm leads, building on early conversations with FrontRow Ventures, Northside Ventures and the MaRS Investment Accelerator Fund, among others.

Milestone 2: PetaScale Formation, Incorporation and IP (March 2027, Weeks 1 to 2)

This milestone establishes PetaScale as a legal and commercial entity while R&D continues inside BioZone. We incorporate federally under the Canada Business Corporations Act as a single Canadian parent company. This keeps PetaScale a Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC), which preserves both the enhanced refundable SR&ED credit during our heaviest R&D years and the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption for our founding team.

Company formation proceeds in sequence: incorporating the operating entity (three to ten days), registering for a CRA Business Number and SR&ED eligibility (one to three weeks), executing the founder IP assignment (two to four days), and finalizing University of Toronto ownership and licensing confirmation (one to three weeks). We negotiate the licence to permit assignment or sublicensing to a future parent entity, which preserves our options without committing us to any structure now.

We establish the cap table at the same time: one class of common shares, standard four-year founder vesting with a one-year cliff, and a documented option pool. We keep early capital in a single instrument rather than a series of differently structured agreements, so the cap table stays straightforward to model.

Regarding IP, we file a provisional patent immediately to secure a twelve-month priority window. In parallel, we secure letters of intent, advance industry conversations and maintain warm investor meetings. The first phase of the raise covers partner meetings followed by technical, IP and market diligence, benchmarked against internal comparables. We continue discussions with MaRS about office and lab space in the same period.

Milestone 3: Incubator Submissions and Canadian VC Raise (Late March to April 2027)

With the entity formed, we focus on closing capital while R&D continues to scale at BioZone. The investment process moves into its second phase: warm meetings leading to a lead investor, term sheet negotiation, final diligence and legal drafting. All three of our warm leads are Canadian funds, so a Canadian corporation raises no structural friction in this round. Operationally, we submit our MaRS space application, PetaScale becomes formally operational, and the round closes within this window to fund ongoing operations.

Milestone 4: Office Move and Pilot Preparation (May to August 2027)

We move into MaRS office and lab space across May and June, transitioning our scale-up R&D and customer pipeline out of BioZone and into MaRS. Over the summer, we prepare our first pilot installations, engage industry partners directly, and file our first SR&ED claim covering the R&D conducted since incorporation. That claim returns non-dilutive cash that extends the runway from our seed round.

Milestone 5: Pilots and Patent Strategy (September to December 2027)

We aim to launch at least two WWTP pilots between September and December, with the first targeted in Ontario alongside the Drinking Water Research Group (DWRG). Once monthly recurring revenue begins, we prepare the full patent application for the United States and Canada, converting the provisional we filed in Milestone 2.

Corporate Structure Beyond Year One

PetaScale operates as a single Canadian corporation for as long as that structure serves the business. Canadian-controlled status returns cash through the refundable SR&ED credit every year we spend on R&D, and it protects the capital gains exemption for our founding team at an exit.

We plan to establish a Delaware subsidiary once we sign our first United States customer, which lets us contract and hire there while the Canadian parent keeps its status. We will reassess the parent structure at Series A. Many United States venture funds invest only in Delaware C Corporations, so a United States lead investor would likely trigger that transition. Before acting, we will weigh the restructuring costs against the Canadian advantages we would give up. The IP and Administration section sets out the structural options and tax considerations on both sides.

The Next 10 Years: Phases

The twelve months above cover the start of Phase 1. Each phase moves PetaScale into a larger market and further up the value chain. The year ranges are directional and will shift depending on traction and capital.

Phase 1 (2026 to 2030): PET Polymer Specific Degradation

Our first phase focuses on room-temperature PET breakdown, deployed initially in wastewater treatment. We size this phase against the water treatment chemicals market, which is the budget these plants already spend and the budget we compete for. Success means a repeatable, revenue-generating enzymatic PET removal product with reference customers.

Phase 2 (2030 onward): Multi-Polymer Degradation

PET is one of several persistent polymers. In this phase, we extend our discovery and optimization engine to additional polymer classes, which expands us from a single-substrate product into the broader environmental remediation market.

Phase 3 (2033 onward): Circular Materials and Upcycling

The third phase moves from breaking plastic down to feeding it back into production. We size this phase against the bioplastic and biodegradable materials market, which is smaller in the near term and higher on the value chain. Here we convert degraded plastic into usable feedstock, which moves PetaScale from a remediation company to also a circular materials platform.

10. Financial Projections

Executive Summary

PetaScale Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Financial Projections Overview

Scope and Assumptions

These projections focus exclusively on PetaScale’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) vertical, reflecting its relative go‑to‑market (GTM) readiness. They are provisional and do not include the revenue or expenses associated with scaling into additional verticals. They use published benchmarks for the enzyme LCC-ICCG (Tournier et al., 2020) until PetaScale's own lab and pilot data replace them. The forecast holds prices and costs flat and does not account for any rise in the enzyme's price due to inflation. It includes only cash revenue, costs, and capital expenditures, leaving depreciation and other accounting treatments to the company’s accountant. All figures and projections are expressed in Canadian dollars (CAD).

Price

PetaScale sells enzymatic PET removal priced at $15.75 per megalitre (ML) of plant influent treated. That’s roughly 35% of what Region of Peel already spends on process chemicals, ($45.26/ML across G.E. Booth and Clarkson in 2023), so it fits within existing treatment budgets instead of requiring additional new budgeting. Variable cost is $3.02/ML: $1.62 for enzyme and $1.40 for cold-chain delivery, dosing and Py-GC/MS verification. Fully loaded cost, which adds production line operations, capex recovery and allocated G&A, is $7.51/ML, for a roughly 2.1x markup. Pilots are billed at $80,000 per pilot-year and convert to full-scale contracts once performance is validated.

Market

Plants in the United States, Canada and Western Europe treat 87.3 billion m³ of wastewater each year, a total addressable market of $1.37 billion a year at PetaScale's price. The serviceable market is Canada's 4.38 billion m³ of secondary and tertiary treatment across 11 provinces and territories, worth $69.1 million a year. Four provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia) hold 89.6% of that volume.

Deployment

PetaScale sells to regional authorities, so one successful pilot wins every eligible plant that authority runs. Pilots begin in Year 1 at Region of Peel, Metro Vancouver and the City of Calgary. Contracts follow in Years 2 and 3, and York-Durham, OCWA's client plants, Winnipeg and Quebec City join in Year 4. By then, PetaScale will serve 24 plants across seven authorities: 13 in Ontario, 3 in British Columbia, 3 in Alberta, 3 in Manitoba and 2 in Quebec. Those plants treat 1.0 billion litres a day, which is 22.9% of the Canadian market and $15.80 million in annual recurring revenue.

Financial Performance

Revenue grows from $80K in Year 1 (pilot fees) to $2.3M in Year 2, $7.1M in Year 3 and $12.9M in Year 4, for $22.4M cumulative. Gross margin rises from 33% during pilots to 63% at scale as production lines fill up. EBITDA turns positive in Year 3 at $1.6M and reaches $5.2M in Year 4, with net income of $3.3M. By the end of Year 4, PetaScale has 7 authorities under contract across 24 plants and $15.8M in ARR, captures about 23% of its $69M Canadian serviceable market, and is cash-flow positive before financing.

Funding

PetaScale plans to raise $22.25M in total. A $7M seed at incorporation (March 2027) funds enzyme development, the MaRS lab fit-out, pilot dosing units, and pilots with Region of Peel, Metro Vancouver and Calgary, through to the first paid contract in Month 19. Cash stays above $1.9M throughout this period and never goes negative. About $830K in non-dilutive funding supplements the seed: $250K in grants and $580K in SR&ED refunds. A $15M Series A in Month 25 (Year 3) pays for the production build-out (8 lines, $12.1M of capex over four years) and expansion into Winnipeg, Quebec City, and other scalable vertical applications (not listed on spreadsheet). The company ends Month 48 cash-flow positive with $15.7M on hand.

Financial Projections Spreadsheet

PetaScale build: four-year WWTP projections
Loading spreadsheet…

11. IP Strategy and Administration

This section sets out how PetaScale protects its technology, structures itself as a company, and manages financial, legal and operational risk as it moves from research into commercial deployment.

IP Strategy

PetaScale’s primary protected asset is its engineered enzymes.

Each patent filing claims a specific engineered sequence, the mutations introduced into a natural starting enzyme, along with closely related variants. Engineered proteins are patentable, whereas naturally occurring sequences generally are not; our protection therefore rests on the modifications we make rather than on the natural candidates in the PETadex. As our customer base expands, our IP portfolio grows in parallel, allowing the business and its intellectual property to scale together.

A patent protects one enzyme for a fixed term. Our pipeline and accumulating field data enable us to design the next enzyme faster than competitors can engineer around the last.

IP Assignment and the Open-Source Boundary

PetaBite grew out of a large student team, so we will complete a full intellectual property assignment sweep before incorporation, while contributors are still reachable. Every member who worked on the design pipeline, the enzyme candidates or the bioreactor hardware signs an assignment to the company, including members who have graduated.

We will also document where the boundary sits between the open-source PETadex release and the proprietary work PetaScale owns. While the PETadex remains open to all researchers, the engineered enzymes belong to the company. By recording this boundary in writing, with contributor attribution on each side, prevents the ownership ambiguity that commonly delays university spinout financings.

Corporate Structure

We will incorporate federally under the Canada Business Corporations Act in March 2027 as a single Canadian parent company. This keeps PetaScale a Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC), which carries two financial benefits:

  • Refundable SR&ED credit. A CCPC claims an enhanced 35% credit on qualified R&D expenditures, refundable in cash even when the company owes no tax. A foreign-controlled subsidiary falls to a 15% credit that is generally non-refundable and returns little before profitability. On our projected R&D spend, this is our largest source of non-dilutive funding through 2030.
  • Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption. Canadian founders can each shelter up to $1.25 million of capital gains at an exit, provided the company remains Canadian-controlled and its assets stay in active use in Canada.

Canadian control also preserves our eligibility for federal and provincial grant programs that restrict funding to Canadian-controlled companies, and it keeps CCPC stock option treatment available to Canadian employees, who can defer tax until they sell rather than when they exercise.

We will add a Delaware subsidiary when we sign our first United States customer, which lets us contract and hire there while the parent keeps its status. We will reassess the parent structure at Series A, since many United States venture funds invest only in a Delaware C Corporation. Restructuring to a Delaware parent would end CCPC status and the benefits above, and exchanging Canadian shares for shares of a United States parent is generally a taxable event for shareholders at fair market value with no cash attached. We will price that restructuring against what we would give up before we act, and we negotiate our University of Toronto licence to permit assignment to a future parent so the option stays open.

Cap Table and Governance

We will establish a single cap table at incorporation with one class of common shares, four-year founder vesting on a one-year cliff, and a documented option pool. We keep early capital in a single instrument rather than a series of differently structured agreements, and we document any equity discussed with advisors or early contributors in writing.

Our board forms when our first financing round closes. Until then, founder decisions above the thresholds in Financial Controls require agreement from two founders.

Financial Controls

PetaScale will operate under written financial controls from incorporation. Clear controls prevent overspending, reduce fraud risk, and produce the records investors expect during diligence.

  • Spending limits. Before our first round closes, expenses above $5,000 require approval from two founders. Once the board is constituted, expenses above $5,000 require board approval, and we review the threshold annually as the operating budget grows.
  • Approval workflows. We define who signs off on expenses, contracts, vendor payments and purchases. Medium-sized expenses require dual approval, and major commitments, including multi-year supplier agreements and capital purchases for the bioreactor array, require board approval. No single person can authorize a large or sensitive financial action alone.
  • Audit procedures. We reconcile bank statements, expenses and accounting entries monthly. An external accountant reviews our records annually. We maintain documented standards for file naming, storage and retention, which supports both investor diligence and our annual SR&ED claim.

Our SR&ED claim depends on contemporaneous records, so we log R&D time, experimental hypotheses and results as the work happens rather than reconstructing them at year end.

Insurance

We will carry general coverage from incorporation and deployment-specific coverage before our first pilot installation.

  • General liability. Covers physical injury, property damage and accidents arising from our operations, field testing and pilot deployments.
  • Directors and officers (D&O). Protects founders and board members against personal liability for management decisions and fiduciary duties. We put this in place when outside investors join and the board is constituted.
  • Intellectual property liability. Covers legal costs if another party claims infringement, and the cost of enforcing our own filings. Our portfolio is central to our defensibility, so this protects the asset the company is built on.

Coverage specific to a biological product. Deploying engineered enzymes creates several exposures we must account for:

  • Environmental liability. Covers accidental release, contamination or unintended ecological effects. Fortunately, our contained packed-bed reactor design keeps this risk very low but insurers expect the category to be covered for any biological product operating in a water system.
  • Product liability. Covers harm caused if an enzyme performs differently than expected or interacts with environmental substrates in an unintended way.
  • Regulatory compliance risk. Covers the cost of regulatory investigations or enforcement actions from environmental regulators, wastewater authorities or biosafety agencies.

Regulatory and Biosafety Compliance

Our Human Practices and Entrepreneurship team has mapped the pathways our deployments fall under, including the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, EPA TSCA Section 5 in the United States, and provincial discharge permits. We will lead with a contained packed-bed reactor so our deployments are classified as contained use rather than open environmental release, which is the lower regulatory burden and the safer starting position.

We will prioritize enzyme candidates with close homology to naturally occurring proteins, and we maintain a documented risk framework that sets the ecological safety evidence we require before any deployment. We will engage regulators at Environment and Climate Change Canada and the United States EPA ahead of our pilots.

Data and Confidentiality

Customer samples, operating conditions and field performance data are commercially sensitive to the customer and central to our own pipeline. We will handle both under written agreements: customers sign a mutual non-disclosure agreement before providing samples, and our service contracts specify what data we may retain and use to improve future enzyme designs. Every employee and contractor signs confidentiality and IP assignment terms as a condition of engagement.

12. Appendix

Overview

This appendix records the entrepreneurial work that shaped PetaBite/PetaScale during the 2026 iGEM season. It shows how we took our scientific progress and built it into a venture that competes, raises funding and operates beyond the lab. This iGEM cycle, we took part in more entrepreneurial public outreach than any iGEM Toronto team before us: five Canadian national competitions, four global competitions, two international conferences, and one completed incubator program.

We placed in the top three overall at six of those competitions, against a cumulative field of hundreds of early-stage startups and university design teams.

Each event tested our pitch in front of judges, investors and industry experts, and the feedback sharpened our business model, our customer focus and our path to market. Through prize funding, lab grants, biomaterials, and in-kind compute credits, we bootstrapped roughly $130,000 CAD in combined cash and non-cash support, while building lasting relationships with the mentors and investors who continue to move PetaScale forward.

Please note that PetaBite and PetaScale were used interchangeably during the competition and conference season, as we were still finalizing the name of our project and its commercialization arm throughout the cycle.

Competitions

UATech Global Pitch Competition: Best Pitch and $25,000 (AWS)

On May 12, 2026, we won Best Pitch at the UATech Global Pitch Competition, where we competed as one of 10 finalists. Co-Presidents Anthony Dinglasan, Purav Gupta and Dry Lab Lead Dennis Zhu presented on behalf of the team. The $25,000 USD in AWS credits funded AI model training and sequence clustering for the PETadex pipeline and covered much of the compute cost of screening our candidate enzymes.

What we learned: A technical audience responds best when we present our science as a cost problem. Pitching to a room focused on technology and cloud infrastructure pushed us to explain our compute needs in concrete, fundable terms, and that framing won us the in-kind resources we needed.

UATech Global Pitch Competition (1 of 2)UATech Global Pitch Competition (2 of 2)

Website: Gallery — TechEmbassy

WebSummit Vancouver: Main Stage Presenter (Top 8% of 1,200 Startups)

Web Summit is a global technology conference founded in Dublin in 2009, and its flagship Lisbon event draws over 70,000 attendees from across the technology industry, venture capital and government. Web Summit Vancouver is its North American edition and it brings together founders, investors and industry leaders from around the world.

On May 14, 2026, PetaScale presented on the main stage at Web Summit Vancouver. Organizers selected us from about 1,200 startups, placing us in the top 8%. Our presentation appears at the 44-minute mark of the "Future of AI and Machine Learning" session:

The future of AI and machine learning - Web Summit Vancouver

Web Summit also named PetaScale an IMPACT startup for innovation in sustainability, a distinction given to the top 10% of startups on that measure. We also ran an exhibition booth, where we introduced our brand and the PETadex to hundreds of international attendees, investors and researchers.

What we learned: A general technology audience needs the problem and the outcome before the biology. We learned to open with what we are solving and why it matters, and to bring in the science only once the audience understood the stakes. This was our first real test of explaining PetaScale to people outside synthetic biology, and it shaped every deck we built afterward. Additional insights from this experience can be found in the Human Practices section.

WebSummit Vancouver (1 of 5)WebSummit Vancouver (2 of 5)WebSummit Vancouver (3 of 5)WebSummit Vancouver (4 of 5)WebSummit Vancouver (5 of 5)

iGEM Startups Global BioHackathon: Judges' Choice Award

We also won the Judges' Choice Award at the 2026 iGEM Startups Global BioHackathon, held March 27 to 29, 2026. The award recognizes outstanding innovation in biotechnology and judges highlighted our work in enzyme discovery. We built our full pitch and video within 48 hours and competed against other iGEM teams and established startups led by professors and biotechnology founders.

The 2026 iGEM Startups BioHackathon: Your First Step Into the World of BioEntrepreneurship — iGEM Blog

What we learned: We can build a clear, competitive pitch under real time pressure. Winning against founder-led startups showed us early in the season that our commercial story could hold up alongside experienced teams.

UofT Rendezvous Research Pitch Competition: Presenter

On May 9, 2026, we presented PetaScale at the University of Toronto's Rendezvous Research Pitch Competition. We pitched the impact of room-temperature enzymatic PET degradation to an audience of researchers and innovators from across the university.

What we learned: Research audiences value scientific rigour, but they still respond most strongly when we open with impact. Rendezvous was our first chance to test a plain-language version of our pitch, and it prepared us for UATech and Web Summit Vancouver later that week.

UofT Rendezvous Research Pitch Competition

Tech Futures Challenge National Competition: Silver

PetaScale earned Silver at the national final of MindFuel's Tech Futures Challenge, a national youth innovation program, held in Calgary on May 30, 2026. The award recognized our strong proof-of-concept prototype, which we backed with controlled testing and continuous iteration on mentor feedback. Judges described our work as "a strong and engaging project" with a "great explanation of problem" and "fantastic teamwork," and noted that our solution "demonstrates strong potential and technical depth." For continued growth, they suggested we "expand scalability considerations and clarify the core product focus ('enzyme or the website?')."

What we learned: That last comment was the most useful feedback we received all season. We had been blurring two separate things in our pitch: the enzymes we engineer and the public tools we built to find them. The feedback led us to separate the two clearly. We now present our engineered enzymes as the product, and PETadex as the open research platform behind them.

Tech Futures Challenge National Competition (1 of 3)Tech Futures Challenge National Competition (2 of 3)Tech Futures Challenge National Competition (3 of 3)

Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition: Participant

In July 2026, we represented PetaBite at the Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition, presenting PetaBite and PETadex to a panel of judges and an international field of over 100 competitors. The judges praised the strength of our technical evidence and challenged us to show stronger product-market fit.

What we learned: Strong technical evidence earns attention, but a winning pitch also needs proof that customers want the product. The judges' feedback reshaped how our Entrepreneurship team approaches customer discovery, and we now measure fit by the commitments customers make across our WWTP, textile effluent, landfill leachate and filtration verticals. A special thank‑you to Paul O’Donnell for his mentorship and guidance throughout the competition.

Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition

Great Canadian iGEM Meetup National Competition: Second Overall, Best Engineering Approach and Best Experimental Evidence

On August 8, 2026, we competed at the Great Canadian iGEM Meetup, the national gathering of Canadian iGEM teams, held at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. Against 10 teams from across Canada, PetaBite placed Second Overall and won Best Engineering Approach and Best Experimental Evidence. The awards recognized our assay, the first version of our bioreactor and the quality of our early experimental data.

What we learned: Two of our three awards came from engineering and experimental evidence, which confirmed that our hardware and wet lab work set us apart from other teams. The results also showed us that our early data was already strong enough to present with confidence.

Great Canadian iGEM Meetup National Competition (1 of 2)Great Canadian iGEM Meetup National Competition (2 of 2)

North American Mini Jamboree Biotechnology Competition: Second Overall

On September 12, 2026, we competed at the North American Mini Jamboree. PetaBite placed Second Overall out of 29 teams/universities, a field of over 200 participants from across North America. We also earned nominations in three categories: Best Entrepreneurship (top 3), Best Human Practices (top 3) and Best Presentation (top 5).

What we learned: Placing second and earning an entrepreneurship nomination against a large, competitive field showed us that our commercial story now holds up. This was the most refined version of our pitch to date, and it reflected the changes we had made since May, including a clearer product focus after Tech Futures and a sharper approach to product-market fit after Imperial.

North American Mini Jamboree Biotechnology Competition

Finalized Scorecard: Scorecard: Toronto - Google Sheets

FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge: Finalist - Top 3 (October 8, 2026)

FOOD FORWARD Summit is Canada's flagship food systems innovation and trade event. The 2026 summit brings over 2,000 leaders, investors, policymakers and researchers to The International Centre in Mississauga, with representatives from Bayer, Royal Bank of Canada, Farm Credit Canada, the National Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Food Innovation Network, Canada's Ocean Supercluster, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and Mowi Canada.

Out of hundreds of pre-seed and seed-stage startups, FOOD FORWARD selected PetaBite as one of three finalists in the Blue Food Systems Innovation Challenge, competing for $5,000 CAD, which recognizes innovations advancing environmental sustainability and resilience across fisheries, aquaculture and the broader blue food economy. We pitched on October 8 before investors and a concentrated, high‑signal audience representing the direct market we aim to serve.

After the conference, Co-Presidents Anthony Dinglasan and Purav Gupta were also invited to contribute to the FOOD FORWARD White Paper, helping translate key insights from the Atlantic, Ottawa, and Toronto event series into actionable recommendations for strengthening Canada's food system.

Website: FOOD FORWARD SUMMIT 2026 | Food Systems Innovation

FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge (1 of 4)FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge (2 of 4)FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge (3 of 4)FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge (4 of 4)
Conferences

Y Combinator Startup School - (Top 5% of Applicants)

Y Combinator (YC) is the startup accelerator in Mountain View, California that funds early-stage companies in exchange for equity and connects them to its founder network. It has backed Airbnb, Stripe, DoorDash, Coinbase and Reddit, and its main accelerator batches accept roughly 1% of applicants, which makes it the most selective and widely recognized startup program in the world.

Co-president Purav Gupta was admitted to Y Combinator's Startup School 2026 in the top 5% of applicants. YC hand-selects builders from around the world for this in-person program, held July 25 and 26, 2026 in San Francisco. Purav learned directly from founders and leaders including Sam Altman, Jensen Huang, and Patrick Collison, gained exposure to YC's approach to go-to-market strategy, and connected with a network of early-stage founders.

What we learned: YC's emphasis on speed and customer obsession gave us a valuable counterweight as a team that naturally leads with science.

Y Combinator Startup School - (Top 5% of Applicants) (1 of 2)Y Combinator Startup School - (Top 5% of Applicants) (2 of 2)

SynBioBeta Global Conference: Attendee

From May 4 to 7, 2026, we represented PetaScale at SynBioBeta 2026, a leading global synthetic biology conference, held at the San Jose Convention Center. The conference connected us with industry leaders, enzyme companies and investors working at the intersection of AI and biology.

What we learned: Conversations with enzyme companies and investors showed us where enzymatic plastic degradation fits in the market. They also confirmed that room-temperature activity is the feature industry values most. Additional insights from this experience can be found in the Human Practices section.

VC and Incubator Conversations

Venture Capital Conversations

PetaScale has held initial conversations with three venture capital firms:

  • FrontRow Ventures: Canada's first and largest student-run venture capital fund. FrontRow backs student-led technology startups across more than 20 university campuses with early cheques and founder-friendly terms.
  • Northside Ventures: A Toronto-based pre-seed and seed-stage firm that backs Canadian founders at company formation. Northside invests in artificial intelligence, software, fintech and cleantech.
  • MaRS Investment Accelerator Fund: One of Ontario's most active seed-stage investors, delivered by MaRS Discovery District and funded by the Government of Ontario. The fund provides capital and commercialization support to early-stage technology, cleantech and life sciences companies.

What we learned: Early investor conversations served both as market research and as warm fundraising leads. Each firm asked how PetaScale moves from a validated enzyme to recurring revenue, helping shape our short‑term goal of shortening the timeline from lab result to first paying customer.

Incubator Programs

1. Wilbe Venture Incubator: Sprint Completion

In April 2026, we completed Wilbe's venture build sprint. Wilbe is an international venture platform for scientist-founders that offers business training, community, lab access and first-cheque capital. Its online cohorts help researchers turn an idea into an investment-ready venture case. The sprint produced an investment-readiness review of PetaScale with two main recommendations, and we have acted on both:

  • Sharpen the value proposition. Replace our platform description with one sentence about customer outcomes that a non-expert, such as a wastewater operator, understands immediately. The review identified this as the change with the highest near-term return.
  • Treat wastewater as the wedge. Build stronger evidence on customer willingness to pay and specific adoption triggers, and define the path from wastewater into adjacent markets.

What we learned: The review identified the clarity of our commercial story as our biggest gap. Both recommendations pointed to the same goal, making PetaScale easy for a non‑expert customer to understand.

2. Creative Destruction Lab: Invitation to Apply

Creative Destruction Lab (CDL) invited PetaScale to apply to its program. CDL is an objectives-based mentorship program for seed-stage science and technology ventures. It began at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management and now runs sites across North America and internationally.

Learning Opportunities

iGEM Entrepreneurship Bootcamp: Participant

On July 25 and 26, 2026, the Entrepreneurship team took part in the iGEM Entrepreneurship Summer Bootcamp, iGEM's introductory entrepreneurship training program for the synthetic biology community. We used the program to test PetaScale's product-market fit across our WWTP, textile effluent, landfill leachate and filtration verticals.

What we learned: Working through a structured entrepreneurship curriculum showed us which verticals we could defend with evidence and which still needed more customer discovery. It confirmed wastewater treatment as our strongest near-term entry point.

iGEM Entrepreneurship Bootcamp
Fundraising, Sponsorships and Advisors

We approached fundraising as partnership building.

At the start of the season, we identified what each subteam would need: reagents and DNA synthesis for the wet lab, compute credits for the dry lab, design and illustration software for documentation, and general funding for the whole project. We then looked for university units, companies and community organizations whose work matched each need. For example, Twist Bioscience, New England Biolabs and IDT supported our wet lab work, SnapGene and BioRender supported our design and figures, and Fraser River Junk Removal helped finance our Human Practice initiatives. We gave priority to organizations that share our goal of reducing plastic pollution.

We tailored our outreach to each organization wherever possible. Each request explained what PetaBite aims to accomplish, why that organization's expertise or resources mattered to our work, and how supporting a student research team could create impact beyond our own experiments.

Fundraising also became part of our broader engagement strategy. Many of these relationships connected us with people and organizations working in sustainability, biotechnology and plastic pollution. Through those conversations, we came to see PetaBite as one part of a much larger community working on solutions to plastic waste.

So thank you to every organization listed below. Your reagents, tools, funding and belief in a student team taking on a hard problem powered PetaBite's wet lab, dry lab and hardware work, and helped turn our plans into results.

University of Toronto Units

Industry Partners

  • Twist Bioscience: A company specializing in synthetic DNA manufacturing and gene synthesis.
  • New England Biolabs (NEB): A supplier of molecular biology reagents for cloning, expression and analysis.
  • Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT): A provider of custom oligonucleotides, primers and molecular biology reagents.
  • SnapGene: A software platform for designing and visualizing DNA constructs and molecular workflows.
  • BioRender: A web-based tool for creating scientific figures and diagrams.

Community Sponsors

  • Fraser River Junk Removal: A student-led junk removal and moving company serving the Greater Vancouver area in British Columbia that prioritizes recycling, donation and proper waste management; supported our microplastics conference.
  • Awesome Foundation Toronto: A local chapter of a global network that awards no-strings grants each month to community projects; funded project materials. We were selected as the March 2026 grantee.
  • Longo's: An Ontario-based grocery retailer that supports local education and sustainability initiatives; supported our microplastics conference.
  • Jukebox: A printing company that supported our sticker fundraising campaign.
  • Quokka Prints: A printing company that supported our merchandise campaign.
2026 Sponsorship PackageOpen PDF ↗

Advising Institutions

Lastly, PetaBite drew on expertise from research centres and faculties across the world. These institutions shaped our science, our regulatory thinking and our commercial strategy, and the pitch we present today reflects their input.

So thank you to Institut Pasteur, the Laboratory for RNA-Based Lifeforms (RNA Lab), BioZone, the Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, the Acceleration Consortium, the Vector Institute and the Drinking Water Research Group. We also thank the faculty at the University of Toronto’s Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, and Rotman School of Management, as well as the Tech Futures Challenge advisors at the University of Calgary and the Global Challenge pitch advisors at Imperial College London. Thank you to every researcher and advisor who shared their time with us. Our pitch and story would not be as refined as they are without your insight and support.

Reiterations of Our Pitch

Evolution of Our Pitch

Our pitch changed substantially across the season, and most of those changes came directly from judge and investor feedback. Early versions opened with our scientific breakthrough and the scale of PETadex. Technical audiences responded well, but general and investor audiences often left unsure of what we actually sell. Over four major iterations, we moved the customer problem to the front, separated our engineered enzymes from the open PETadex platform, and tightened our product-market fit story. The entries below track that progression in order.

Note: Some figures, particularly those in the earliest versions of the pitch, may be outdated due to progress made throughout the iGEM cycle.

Pitch Deck: Web Summit Vancouver (May 14, 2026)

This was our first major deck for a broad audience of technology professionals and investors. It opened with our discovery breakthrough and the scale of PETadex. The response showed us that opening with the science loses non-experts, and that lesson set the direction for every revision that followed.

Web Summit Vancouver pitch deckOpen PDF ↗

Pitch Deck and Pitch Video: Tech Futures Challenge (May 30, 2026)

We revised the deck in response to the judges' "enzyme or the website?" feedback. We separated our engineered enzymes, which are the product, from the PETadex, the open research platform we use to find them, and we defined our core product more clearly.

Tech Futures Challenge pitch deckOpen PDF ↗
Tech Futures Challenge pitch video

Pitch Deck and Pitch Video: Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition (July 10-30, 2026)

After the Imperial panel challenged us on product-market fit, we rebuilt the pitch around it. We kept the technical evidence the judges praised and reframed it around a clear customer outcome in each of our verticals.

Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition pitch deckOpen PDF ↗
Imperial College London Global Pitch Competition pitch video

Pitch Deck: North American Mini Jamboree (September 12, 2026)

This is our most refined version for iGEM-style competitions. It opens with the customer problem and our product-market fit story, and it presents the technical platform as the engine that makes our product possible. This iteration contributed to our Second Overall placement and our Best Entrepreneurship nomination.

North American Mini Jamboree pitch deckOpen PDF ↗

Pitch Deck: FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge (October 8, 2026)

While our North American Mini Jamboree Pitch Deck was optimized for iGEM-style competitions, this deck represents our most balanced presentation to date. It combines the technical rigor of our previous pitches with a stronger entrepreneurial narrative, making it well suited for a general audience. Using this deck, we achieved a Top 3 placement among hundreds of seed-stage startups.

FOOD FORWARD Innovation Challenge pitch deckOpen PDF ↗